WHEN A CHURCH IS NOT A CHURCH
Warren Cole Smith
MinistryWatch.com, December
19, 2019
Non-profit organizations do great work in this country. Non-profits employ
more than 12 million people and contribute $2 trillion to our national
economy. They also mobilize millions more in volunteer activities, reducing and
sometimes eliminating the need for government services.
The value of non-profits is so great that our tax
code treats them in a special way. Donors can deduct gifts to non-profits. The
non-profits themselves are exempt from most taxes. In fact, what most
of us think of as “non-profits” or “ministries” are identified by
law as “tax-exempt” organizations. Historically, we have
gladly given these tax exemptions recognizing the great value these
organizations bring to our country and the world.
But we require tax-exempt organizations to do one
important thing. We ask them to provide evidence they are doing what they
say they are doing. An important way that exempt
organizations meet this requirement is by completing an annual Form
990.
The Form 990 looks like a tax return, and it includes
important information about the organization, including annual revenue,
salaries of key employees, names of board members and large
contractors, and the amount of money the organization spends on its core
mission. Also highlighted are the amounts it spends on administrative
and fundraising. This information is valuable to donors wanting to assess the
effectiveness of a ministry.
But there’s an exception to this requirement. If
your organization is a church, you do not have to submit your Form 990 to the
public. The logic goes like this: Churches have leadership and
members who live in community with each other. Almost all the donors come
from within that community. Whatever transparency and
accountability are necessary will be provided by the rules and
structure of the church. The government has no business interfering
in a church’s internal affairs.
It’s a system that has worked well for decades, but it is
a system that is rapidly breaking down as more tax-exempt organizations
that clearly are not churches are claiming the church
exception. These organizations are using this exception to keep not only
the government, but also donors, from seeing how their money is being
spent.
This practice is not new. Controversial and sometimes
outright fraudulent organizations have been claiming the church exemption for
years. It’s a common practice of televangelists and prosperity gospel
preachers. From 2008 to 2011, Sen. Charles Grassley investigated six
televangelists – Benny Hinn, Eddie Long, Joyce Meyer, Kenneth
Copeland, Creflo Dollar, and Paula White-Cain. The
investigation was necessary in part because their organizations were not
transparent in their dealings. The organizations they led spent donor
money on mansions, lavish lifestyles, and private jets.
Now, though, other organizations are following their
example. Among the organizations who now claim the church exemption
are: Cru (formerly Campus Crusade for Christ), The Navigators, the Billy
Graham Evangelistic Association, Focus on the Family, the Willow
Creek Association, Gideons International, Ethnos 360/New Tribes
Mission, Precept Ministries, and Ravi Zacharias International
Ministries. Many of these organizations have made this change in
the past five years.
Paul Batura, a spokesman for Focus on the Family,
explained why that organization recently made the change:
This was done primarily to protect the confidentiality
of our donors. In recent years there have been several occasions on which
non-profit organizations – on both the right and the left – were targeted for
information, including the names and personal details of their donors. In order
to protect our constituents’ privacy, and because Focus does, in fact, meet the
definition of a church under IRS regulations, we applied for and received this
designation. In doing so, we have joined the company of many other Christian
non-profit para-church organizations who have done likewise. Having said this,
we remain committed to the highest standards of fiscal transparency and will
continue to make our financial statements available.
We at MinistryWatch have dealt with Focus on
the Family literally for decades, and have no reason to
doubt this ministry will be as good as its word on issues of transparency.
Further, we understand the concerns that motivated
this action. The threat of pro-LGBTQ groups, atheist groups, and their
allies is not hypothetical. These groups have, on occasion, used
public filings to identify and harass contractors and donors of organizations
that stand for life, marriage, and religious liberty. This is a despicable
practice, engaged in by unscrupulous bullies.
Nonetheless, MinistryWatch’s position is
that transparency with donors and with the public is a higher value. The
integrity and credibility of Christian non-profits are being questioned as
never before, and these concerns pose a clear and present threat
to Christian non-profits. Withholding Form 990s from donors and the
public is not the right solution to this problem.
For one thing, the IRS makes allowance for a key
concern: donor confidentiality. Ministries are in full compliance with
the disclosure rules by releasing Form 990s with the donor section
redacted. A ministry can release its 990s and still fully protect
the confidentiality of its donors.
But the larger issue is this: Financial marketplaces – including
donor marketplaces – thrive where there is transparency and accountability. As
the old saying goes: “Sunlight is the best disinfectant.”
The opposite is also true: Bad practices thrive in
darkness. This truism relates not only the individual organization, but to
the marketplace in which it operates. Where there is a lack of
information, trust goes down and disinformation can flourish. Donors lose
confidence in individual organizations and society loses confidence in the
value of the entire sector they represent.
Further, hiding behind the church exemption will not
turn back those who want to banish religious voices from the public square,
and the practice may even give them additional ammunition.
Indeed, the church exemption itself is now being
questioned, most publicly in recent months by former presidential
candidate Beto O’Rourke and New York Times columnist Mark Oppenheimer. Hiding
behind the church exemption will not end the attacks these ministries
fear, and it will have the unintended consequence of alienating a
skeptical public who has been taught to believe that when people have nothing
to hide, they usually don’t.
So to donors we say: Don’t give money to a ministry
if you are not sure where the money is going. That should be a minimum
responsibility of a good steward. If your favorite ministry is not
releasing its Form 990s to the public, you should be asking why.
And to Christian
ministries MinistryWatch says: Open your
books.
In fact, since we used Focus on the
Family as an example, we should also tell the rest of the story:
Focus has arrived at a solution that we think makes sense given the
current environment. It claims to be a “church” for purposes of government
disclosure, but it chooses to release its Form 990s (with donor
information redacted) on its own website.
We commend Focus on the Family for a solution
that protects donor confidentiality while maintaining a high level of
transparency and accountability.
It is our hope that others will do likewise.
Warren Cole Smith is the president of
MinistryWatch.com.
Comments
Post a Comment